Lower Cost

Lower Cost

Lower pathway cost through smarter use of diagnostic capacity.

Uromonitor® can support a more efficient bladder cancer surveillance model by helping services reduce unnecessary cystoscopy demand, avoidable downstream procedures and pressure on constrained clinical capacity.

Reduce avoidable demand Support triage of lower-risk surveillance episodes.
Release capacity Focus cystoscopy resource where it creates greater value.
Control implementation Designed for governed NHS and private provider pathways.
NHS diagnostics planning scene with clinicians reviewing pathway data
Risk review Segment demand
Urine triage Lower burden
Capacity release Smarter lists
Cost control Pathway value

The financial case starts with unnecessary cystoscopy demand.

Bladder cancer surveillance places recurring pressure on urology services. Many cystoscopies are essential, but high-volume routine surveillance can create avoidable cost and capacity strain. A governed molecular urine pathway can help providers use invasive investigation more selectively.

Medical illustration showing reduced unnecessary cystoscopy demand through pathway triage
01

Fewer unnecessary cystoscopies

Uromonitor can support selection of patients who may not require immediate invasive investigation, where clinical risk and pathway rules support that decision.

02

Less downstream pressure

Better triage can reduce avoidable appointments, repeat sampling, administrative burden and unnecessary follow-on procedures.

03

Better use of specialist time

Clinical capacity can be directed towards higher-risk patients and urgent suspected cancer pathways, improving productivity without weakening governance.

Cost Pathway

Cost reduction comes from redesigning the pathway, not cutting corners.

Uromonitor should be used as a governed adjunct to cystoscopy and cytology. The value comes from using existing capacity more intelligently.

1

Current surveillance demand

Routine follow-up creates repeated cystoscopy pressure over time.

2

Risk-adapted triage

Lower and higher-risk surveillance episodes are separated more clearly.

3

Reflex Uromonitor

Molecular urine testing adds another decision signal into the pathway.

4

Selective cystoscopy

Cystoscopy is focused where clinical and molecular concern is higher.

5

Cost and time saving

Avoidable procedures and low-yield appointments can be reduced.

Operational Value

Lower cost is achieved by reducing low-yield activity.

The strongest cost argument is not simply the price of a test. It is the effect on the whole pathway: fewer unnecessary cystoscopies, fewer avoidable downstream procedures and more efficient use of specialist clinical time.

Cystoscopy capacity Reduce avoidable surveillance pressure and reserve capacity for higher-priority cases.
Clinical time Support a model where specialist time is focused on patients most likely to need investigation.
Downstream procedures Better triage may help avoid unnecessary follow-on procedures and theatre-linked demand.
Pathway economics The financial case is created across the pathway, not by treating Uromonitor as a standalone test.
Implementation Control

Lower cost still needs clinical governance.

Cost reduction only matters if patient safety and clinical confidence are maintained. Uromonitor should sit inside a defined pathway with patient-selection rules, escalation criteria, laboratory governance and outcome audit.

Defined inclusion and exclusion criteria for pathway use.
Clear rules for positive results, negative results and cystoscopy escalation.
Laboratory quality control, reporting and turnaround-time governance.
Audit of cystoscopy reduction, missed recurrence risk and overall pathway impact.
Modern hospital diagnostics workflow with fewer unnecessary procedures and clinical prioritisation

Discuss pathway cost reduction.

Speak to Progen Diagnostics about how Uromonitor could support cystoscopy capacity release, reduced avoidable procedures and a more efficient bladder cancer surveillance pathway.

Discuss Implementation